G

// SCOUT_HOMEPAGE

GRANTDN

SCOUT WANNABE

PROFILES

01

BOARD_SPOTS

10

YEAR

2026

PUBLIC_LINK // READY
SCOUTS_HUB

// SAVED_BOARD

2026_OVERALL_BOARD

TOP_10

// PROSPECT_GUIDE

ADAY MARA

01 / 01
Aday Mara
#5
MY_RANK
Michigan
TOWERING FACILITATORC

ADAY MARA

A behemoth providing a near-unprecedented combination of playmaking wherewithal and defensive intimidation. The most underrated player in the 2026 class. Click for in depth report

// CORE_METRICS
PPG12.1
RPG6.8
APG2.4
SPG0.4
BPG2.6
MPG23.4
HEIGHT7'3.0"
WINGSPAN7'6.0"
WEIGHT260
AGE21.2

// EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY

Basketball is a game where one team attempts to place a ball in a hoop that is 10 feet above the ground, while the other attempts to prevent that from happening. Considering the height of the hoop, obtaining tall players is an excellent strategy for both sides of the game. Intuitive, no? Likely, this did not need to be rehashed. However, when studying the impact of Spanish Giant Aday Mara, it is important that the discussion does not become overcomplicated; basketball is a game for tall people, and in the 2026 NBA draft, Aday Mara is the tallest.

ADAY_MARA_STAT_PROFILE
OFFENSIVE
ADJ_IMPACT
70
OFF_RAPM
69
CREATION
42
EFFICIENCY
91
BOX_CREATION
75
RIM_PRESSURE
47
RIM_ASSIST
94
REBOUNDING
25
TOV_ECONOMY
28
SPACING
66
MOREY
69
DEFENSIVE
ADJ_IMPACT
99
DEF_RAPM
83
STEALS
10
BLOCKS
90
FOUL_IQ
82
REBOUNDING
50
HEIGHT
98
WINGSPAN
88
WEIGHT
88

Percentiles are positional, measured against NBA players' last season in college.

STRENGTHS_WEAKNESSES

// OFFENSIVE_EVALUATION

The trait that separates Mara from other lumbering collegiate rim protectors comes in the form of his passing, which is a true outlier for someone his size. It’s easy for giants to rest on their laurels through their developmental process; feast upon lower levels without taking the time to improve at the skills necessary for continued success as the competition becomes stronger. Mara, however, consistently displays passing vision and accuracy that are only obtained through relentless practice. These passes come in a variety of circumstances; high-low passing, short-roll finds, and off of doubles from the post are clearly all firmly in his toolbox. In particular, expect Mara’s elite outlet passing to instantly be a boost for an NBA team’s transition offense. While the rim-protection and playmaking will be Mara’s moneymakers at the next level, his strengths extend beyond the flashy. He is a strong finisher near the rim - 80.3% on 142 attempts - and shows an encouraging use of his size and soft touch. Additionally, while not being the outlier that his size suggests he could be, he is still clearly a positive rebounder, especially on the offensive end. For those desiring a stretch 5 to create a starting lineup with shooters at all positions, Mara is not near the top of your draft board. He has made 2 three pointers throughout his college tenure, and his paltry 58% from the free throw line doesn’t inspire too much confidence in substantial shooting development. This isn’t a dealbreaker, by any means - “traditional” centers still find success throughout the NBA - but it should be considered when evaluating Mara’s potential.

//GAME_LOG
[2026] Michigan
DateOpponentMinUSGTS%Pts|RebAst|TovStl|BlkFG3PFTGmSc
No box score data available for this season
Source::CollegeBasketballData_API

// DEFENSIVE_EVALUATION

Mara’s towering frame is not wasted on him - the Michigan center is as imposing a rim protector as there is in college basketball. The raw block numbers, while impressive, undersell his impact - Michigan’s opponents shoot only 48.5% at the rim with Mara in the game, compared to 56.8% with him on the bench. Utah Jazz fans, who have seen intimidating rim protectors such as Rudy Gobert and Walker Kessler up close, will find Mara’s defensive dominance familiar; opponents will consistently find themselves near the basket, sense Mara’s presence, and then make the sound decision of regrouping at the perimeter and trying again. This defensive footprint is not solely a symptom of 99th percentile size, however - Mara is cerebral in his understanding of timing and positioning. It is easy to anticipate Mara being a solid positive in pick-and-roll drop coverages the moment he steps foot into the league. No matter the era, size combined with awareness will always translate to defensive impact. Mara also has sometimes struggled with stamina, which is to be expected considering his monstrous frame. He plays about 56% of Michigan’s minutes this year, and when tasked with longer stretches, his fatigue jumps off the screen. Donovan Clingan’s usage is a good example of how Mara could be used at the next level - massive per minute impact in Portland this year, but best reserved for small, focused doses. While on the topic of movement skills, he is quicker on his feet than some 7’3 players but is by no means a switchable 5. Drop coverage will be his ideal defensive scheme throughout his career. While not being weak or soft by any means, Mara’s high center of gravity can sometimes result in him being knocked off of his spots on both ends. Strong, stocky, shorter defenders could cause him some trouble in his early years as he develops NBA strength and physicality. It is likely that Mara is best suited for lineups featuring strength beside him at the forward spots.

//CORE_OVERVIEW
Year
G
MPG
BPM
BPM+
PPG
RPG
APG
SPG
BPG
TOPG
TS%
rTS
2P%
3P%
FT%
'26Jr
Michigan
40
23.423
12.796
+6.289
12.150
6.832
2.493
0.412
2.681
2.035
65.8%91
+9.3%77
68.0%92
30.0%83
56.4%17
'25So
UCLA
33
13.11
10.386
+6.089
6.46
4.03
1.045
0.22
1.645
0.893
59.4%46
+3.7%32
59.0%50
0.0%50
57.7%20
'24Fr
UCLA
27
9.550
1.72
+0.757
3.51
1.950
0.513
0.150
0.75
0.698
47.8%0
-7.3%1
43.2%1
0.0%50
70.0%71
//OFFENSIVE_STATS
Year
OBPM
OBPM+
Load
USG%
TS%
rTS
2P_TS
AST%
AST/USG
AST/TO
CTOV%
FTR
3PR
Morey
UA_RIM
RIM_AST
AST'D%
'26Jr
Michigan
5.275
+0.870
27.842
23.8%59
65.8%91
+9.3%77
67.3%85
19.0%97
0.896
1.287
14.4%28
46.5%38
0.0370
0.6869
2.147
3.294
65.1%36
'25So
UCLA
5.074
+2.984
29.349
25.9%80
59.4%46
+3.7%32
60.2%39
16.7%93
0.689
1.287
11.4%70
49.3%46
0.000
0.5634
0.815
2.187
65.8%33
'24Fr
UCLA
-1.14
-0.460
23.420
23.8%59
47.8%0
-7.3%1
48.3%1
13.8%86
0.684
0.862
13.4%39
37.0%14
0.000
0.271
0.918
2.187
72.2%21
//SHOOTING_STATS(per 100 poss)
Year
EFG
Rim
Rim%
Mid
Mid%
RIM/MID
3PA
3P%
FTA
FT%
'26Jr
Michigan
67.3%93
9.844
81.1%95
4.829
41.1%58
2.165
0.566
30.0%83
7.023
56.4%17
'25So
UCLA
59.0%55
9.844
67.9%27
7.664
47.6%87
1.334
0.00
0.0%0
8.646
57.7%20
'24Fr
UCLA
43.2%0
4.10
72.7%61
10.989
32.2%17
0.41
0.00
0.0%0
5.610
70.0%71
//DEFENSIVE_STATS
Year
DBPM
DBPM+
STL%
BLK%
ORB%
DRB%
FC/40
Stk/Foul
'26Jr
Michigan
7.699
+5.399
0.8%10
12.0%90
10.4%25
20.4%50
3.852
1.482
'25So
UCLA
5.288
+3.189
0.8%10
17.2%98
16.9%95
21.7%59
4.235
1.382
'24Fr
UCLA
2.945
+1.157
0.5%2
9.4%73
5.7%1
15.8%11
3.852
0.944
PCTL_RANK::VS_NBA_AT_POS

// PROJECTION

The in-your-face impact of a guy like Labaron Philon or Tounde Yessoufou is probably more intense than what Mara brings - it’s hard to miss a killer crossover or ferocious slam. But the value that players like Mara tend to provide over the length of their careers cannot be denied, even if that value is discrete, hidden within good teams. You may not notice it, but players will shoot a little bit worse when Mara’s in the game, and those extra misses here and there are key plays, just like a Philon hesitation dribble or a Yessoufou alley-oop. This latent value makes it easy to picture a world where a “defensive anchor+DHO playmaker” returns lottery value in future redrafts. Comparisons: Andrew Bogut, Jusuf Nurkic (offensively), clunkier Donovan Clingan

SHOT PROFILE(Per 100 Poss)
<USG%/>
23.8%59
<TS%/>
65.8%91
<MOREY/>
0.6869
<FTR/>
46.5038
RIM
81.1%95
9.8ATT44
29%UA
71%AST
MID
41.1%58
4.8ATT29
3PT
30.0%83
0.5ATT66
33%UA
67%AST
FT
56.4%17
7.0ATT23