R

// SCOUT_HOMEPAGE

RAFS1MMONS

ballin like monta ellis

DRAFT ANALYST

PROFILES

08

BOARD_SPOTS

14

YEAR

2026

PUBLIC_LINK // READY
SCOUTS_HUB

// SAVED_BOARD

2026_OVERALL_BOARD

TOP_14

// PROSPECT_GUIDE

RYAN CONWELL

01 / 08
Ryan Conwell
#43
Louisville
Combo G

RYAN CONWELL

Ryan Conwell is a prototypical floor spacing guard whose value is rooted in elite catch and shoot gravity and highly scheme friendly shot selection. He consistently generates efficient looks by leaning into threes and rim attempts while avoiding low value mid range shots, which allows him to fit cleanly into modern NBA offences.

// CORE_METRICS
PPG18.8
RPG4.8
APG2.7
SPG1.1
BPG0.2
MPG30.9
HEIGHT6'1.8"
WINGSPAN6'7.0"
WEIGHT215
AGE22.0
// NBA_COMPARISONS
CEILING
WORSE
Max Strus

High volume three point specialist who carved out a real role, Max Strus represents a strong ceiling outcome that depends on consistent shooting and passable defence. Conwell shows similar shot selection and off ball gravity, but Strus brings more physicality, defensive competitiveness, and proven shot making at high levels. Given Conwell’s defensive limitations and recent efficiency dip, it’s more realistic that he falls short of that level unless his shooting and overall impact take a significant step forward.

MEDIAN
SLIGHTLY WORSE
Bryn Forbes

Reliable floor spacer with limited creation and defensive value, a role Conwell could reasonably slide into if his shot translates. However, Bryn Forbes has proven elite shooting efficiency at the NBA level, which is a high bar, and Conwell’s recent regression plus weaker overall efficiency suggest he’s slightly less likely to reach that level of consistency, making a slightly lower outcome more realistic.

FLOOR
SLIGHTLY BETTER
Zach Norvell Jr.

Conwell profiles similarly to Zach Norvell Jr. as a shooting focused guard who relies on spacing, shot selection, and off ball play rather than creation. However, Conwell’s elite shot diet, stronger frame, and rebounding give him a slightly higher floor as a role player. If his three point shooting stabilises closer to his free throw indicators, he has a better chance to stick as a rotation spacer, whereas Norvell has struggled to maintain efficiency and consistency at the NBA level.

// BADGES
33P_SNIPER
33RIMMOREY_BALL
OLD_MAN
-LBLIGHTWEIGHT
TOV%TURNOVER_PRONE

// EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY

I've been looking for shooters in this draft who can space the floor at an elite level without needing plays called for them, and Ryan Conwell's name kept popping up. The 22 year old Louisville senior sits in the 99th percentile for three point volume 17.4 attempts per 100 possessions and Morey Rate 0.91, meaning nearly all his two point looks come at the rim while he lives beyond the arc. That kind of shot diet is exactly what modern NBA offences crave. The question is whether the rest of his game can catch up to that spacing profile.

RYAN_CONWELL_STAT_PROFILE
OFFENSIVE
ADJ_IMPACT
39
OFF_RAPM
60
CREATION
65
EFFICIENCY
55
BOX_CREATION
42
RIM_PRESSURE
48
RIM_ASSIST
17
REBOUNDING
48
TOV_ECONOMY
64
SPACING
99
MOREY
99
DEFENSIVE
ADJ_IMPACT
40
DEF_RAPM
38
STEALS
26
BLOCKS
38
FOUL_IQ
10
REBOUNDING
87
HEIGHT
42
WINGSPAN
50
WEIGHT
94

Percentiles are positional, measured against NBA players' last season in college.

STRENGTHS_WEAKNESSES

// OFFENSIVE_EVALUATION

Conwell’s offensive profile is defined by strong shot selection and clear role fit, but also some limitations. His 0.91 Morey Rate stands out as elite, as he takes 17.4 threes per 100 possessions in the 99th percentile while almost completely avoiding mid range attempts, which makes him very scheme friendly. He also provides catch and shoot gravity, with about 70% of his threes being assisted, and although he shot 34.5%, a dip from previous seasons, that mark is still workable given his volume and shot difficulty. His 83% career free throw shooting is another positive indicator, suggesting his three point shooting could stabilise closer to league average in a smaller NBA role. However, there are concerns, particularly with his efficiency regression, as his true shooting percentage dropped nearly eight points from his sophomore to senior year and his relative true shooting is now only slightly above average, even accounting for factors like Louisville’s offence and his higher usage. He also offers limited creation, with a 16th percentile assist rate and a 1.2 assist to turnover ratio, meaning he is not suited to initiating offence, and his 15th percentile rim assists show he rarely collapses defences or creates for others. As a finisher, he is adequate but not a major threat, shooting 59% at the rim on 6.5 attempts per 100 possessions, with only 35% of those makes unassisted, and a free throw rate in the 31st percentile indicating he does not draw many fouls on drives. Overall, his play type breakdown reinforces this role, with about 35% of his offence coming from perimeter shooting at 1.02 points per possession, 28% from rim attacks and cuts ranging from 1.01 to 1.31 points per possession, and 19% in transition at 1.10 points per possession, while his attack and kick playmaking is efficient at 1.08 points per possession but used sparingly, and he rarely operates in the pick and roll as a passer, making him more of a finisher and floor spacer than a true creator.

//GAME_LOG
[2026] Louisville
DateOpponentMinUSGTS%Pts|RebAst|TovStl|BlkFG3PFTGmSc
No box score data available for this season
Source::CollegeBasketballData_API

// DEFENSIVE_EVALUATION

Defence is the swing factor for Conwell’s NBA future, and the numbers are not encouraging. He struggles with foul trouble, averaging 3.6 fouls per 40 minutes in the 7th percentile alongside a 0.5 STK to foul ratio in the 9th percentile, which suggests difficulty staying on the floor in physical matchups. His lack of defensive playmaking is also evident, ranking in the 24th percentile in steal rate and 34th percentile in block rate, meaning he doesn’t disrupt passing lanes or contest shots at a meaningful level. In terms of size, at 6′3″ with a 6′8″ wingspan, he has decent length but remains undersized against bigger shooting guards; although his 215 pound frame in the 94th percentile helps absorb contact, his defensive RAPM in the 37th percentile indicates that strength hasn’t translated into impact. One bright spot is his rebounding, as his 14.4% defensive rebounding rate in the 86th percentile shows he can box out and contribute on the glass from the perimeter. Overall, Conwell projects as a minus defender at the NBA level, lacking the lateral quickness to stay in front of guards and the length to consistently bother wings, with his best case outcome being simply not a liability if he reduces fouling and better leverages his physicality.

//CORE_OVERVIEW
Year
G
MPG
BPM
BPM+
PPG
RPG
APG
SPG
BPG
TOPG
TS%
rTS
2P%
3P%
FT%
'26Sr
Louisville
34
30.928
5.942
-2.334
18.881
4.878
2.720
1.124
0.235
2.353
56.6%55
+0.1%35
53.0%75
34.5%34
83.2%74
'25Jr
Xavier
34
33.051
5.538
-0.851
16.562
2.712
2.517
1.342
0.235
1.785
61.8%89
+6.1%85
51.0%62
41.2%85
82.8%71
'24So
Indiana St.
37
33.974
5.544
+1.878
16.668
5.875
2.564
1.141
0.332
1.758
64.2%95
+9.1%95
60.7%96
40.0%77
86.6%90
'23Fr
South Florida
32
18.60
-1.61
-2.038
5.10
1.92
1.95
0.910
0.111
1.492
47.4%1
-6.7%2
39.7%3
30.0%11
81.6%64
//OFFENSIVE_STATS
Year
OBPM
OBPM+
Load
USG%
TS%
rTS
2P_TS
AST%
AST/USG
AST/TO
CTOV%
FTR
3PR
Morey
UA_RIM
RIM_AST
AST'D%
'26Sr
Louisville
4.346
-1.539
42.265
27.5%75
56.6%55
+0.1%35
64.7%91
16.5%18
0.611
1.215
9.7%64
30.2%33
0.6697
0.9199
2.548
2.217
51.8%13
'25Jr
Xavier
4.346
+0.362
33.419
22.1%27
61.8%89
+6.1%85
63.1%85
14.9%13
0.717
1.532
8.8%74
34.3%48
0.6195
0.9097
2.032
2.219
61.8%4
'24So
Indiana St.
4.657
+3.084
29.526
20.8%29
64.2%95
+9.1%95
70.9%99
12.8%46
0.655
1.571
9.2%67
31.0%44
0.6393
0.92100
2.570
2.063
60.3%29
'23Fr
South Florida
-2.50
-1.241
26.43
17.8%4
47.4%1
-6.7%2
50.8%7
17.7%22
1.050
1.427
15.4%4
24.8%17
0.5993
0.8488
0.77
2.116
72.5%1
//SHOOTING_STATS(per 100 poss)
Year
EFG
Rim
Rim%
Mid
Mid%
RIM/MID
3PA
3P%
FTA
FT%
'26Sr
Louisville
52.1%54
6.556
59.0%45
2.55
37.0%40
2.694
17.499
34.5%34
8.058
83.2%74
'25Jr
Xavier
57.7%91
5.842
55.9%27
2.14
37.5%43
2.895
12.591
41.2%85
7.043
82.8%71
'24So
Indiana St.
60.2%95
5.340
61.3%36
1.42
58.1%100
3.897
11.582
40.0%77
5.631
86.6%90
'23Fr
South Florida
42.8%1
3.712
43.6%1
2.34
33.3%20
1.679
8.454
30.0%11
3.64
81.6%64
//DEFENSIVE_STATS
Year
DBPM
DBPM+
STL%
BLK%
ORB%
DRB%
FC/40
Stk/Foul
'26Sr
Louisville
1.542
-0.840
2.0%26
0.6%38
2.3%48
14.4%87
3.67
0.510
'25Jr
Xavier
1.130
-1.132
2.3%41
0.6%38
1.0%5
8.8%21
3.026
0.623
'24So
Indiana St.
0.931
-1.137
1.8%30
0.8%24
3.0%29
15.9%78
3.316
0.515
'23Fr
South Florida
0.926
-0.840
2.7%61
0.4%24
2.1%41
9.6%33
3.67
0.622
PCTL_RANK::VS_NBA_AT_POS

// PROJECTION

Conwell's path to the NBA is narrow but clear: he needs to be a knockdown shooter. His shot profile is already optimised for modern offences, and his size and frame give him a puncher's chance of sticking on a roster. If he can shoot 37-38% from three on catch and shoot looks, he's a useful 10th or 11th man who spaces the floor and doesn't hurt you on the glass. The risks are real. He's old for a prospect, his efficiency trended the wrong way in his final college season, and he offers almost nothing as a playmaker or defender. He's not someone you can hide in a playoff rotation, and his creation limitations mean he'll never be more than a role player. Late second round 45-58.

SHOT PROFILE(Per 100 Poss)
<USG%/>
27.5%75
<TS%/>
56.6%55
<MOREY/>
0.9199
<FTR/>
30.2033
RIM
59.0%45
6.5ATT56
65%UA
35%AST
MID
37.0%40
2.5ATT5
3PT
34.5%34
17.4ATT99
30%UA
70%AST
FT
83.2%74
8.0ATT58