F

// SCOUT_HOMEPAGE

FRA-SEMPRU

Development curve, understanding the game, and impact are everything. I don't care if your projection is to collect all-star numbers if your overall impact is negative or neutral at best.

SCOUT WANNABE

PROFILES

02

BOARD_SPOTS

59

YEAR

2026

PUBLIC_LINK // READY
SCOUTS_HUB

// SAVED_BOARD

2026_OVERALL_BOARD

TOP_30

// PROSPECT_GUIDE

EBUKA OKORIE

01 / 02
Ebuka Okorie
#11
MY_RANK
Stanford
Scoring PG

EBUKA OKORIE

A speedy and crafty PG who's impossible to keep out of the paint and can arrive at the rim at will without losing the ball. He started his career as a 3-star recruit but teleported himself in the first-round mix after a stellar freshman season.

// CORE_METRICS
PPG23.2
RPG3.6
APG3.6
SPG1.6
BPG0.3
MPG35.1
HEIGHT6'1.3"
WINGSPAN6'7.8"
WEIGHT186
AGE19.2
// NBA_COMPARISONS
CEILING
Tony Parker

Tony Parker built a Hall of Fame career on the intersection of elite speed and interior craft—a combination that fueled four top-10 MVP finishes. While Ebuka Okorie projects as a more natural shooter than Parker was at the same age, today’s game has evolved to a point where a better jumper doesn’t necessarily change the defensive blueprint; opponents will still be more terrified of his explosive first step than his perimeter game. Parker’s dominance was anchored by a deadly floater that neutralized size in the paint and allowed him to consistently finish among the trees. Furthermore, one of Parker’s greatest strengths was his "scalability"—the ability to shift roles and thrive alongside other stars—a level of adaptability that Okorie has yet to fully demonstrate. Damian Lillard serves as another intriguing comparison for his playstyle, but despite Okorie’s promising indicators, Dame entered the league as a significantly more advanced prospect in terms of shooting projection. Like both stars, Okorie is projected primarily as a scoring-first point guard. His assists are largely a byproduct of his ability to blow by his defender and create an immediate advantage, rather than a result of systematically manipulating a defense to open up passing lanes.

MEDIAN
Dennis Schröder

In a median outcome scenario, Okorie’s trajectory mirrors that of Dennis Schröder: a high-end, lightning-fast guard who serves as a persistent thorn in the defense's side but falls just short of the All-Star tier. If his pace management and shooting consistency fail to take a significant leap, Okorie risks becoming a "change-of-pace" weapon rather than a true franchise floor general. Much like Schröder, his value would stem from his ability to collapse defenses and provide aggressive point-of-attack pressure; however, without a reliable pull-up jumper or elite decision-making, he may find himself best suited as a high-usage spark plug off the bench or a complementary starter. In this projection, Okorie remains a high-level NBA contributor, yet one whose impact is occasionally neutralized by erratic efficiency and a playstyle that leans more on raw speed than calculated rhythm.

FLOOR
SLIGHTLY BETTER
Ish Smith

In his low-end outcome, Okorie’s career could track similarly to that of Ish Smith: a dependable, journeyman backup whose primary value lies in his ability to inject instant pace into a game. While Okorie enters the league with a much more promising shooting profile than Smith ever possessed, the floor for this projection remains tied to his physical limitations and the "one-dimensional" nature of elite speed. If his playmaking doesn't evolve beyond reactive passing and his defensive impact is hampered by his lack of size, Okorie risks being pigeonholed as a specialized "energy" guard. In this scenario, despite being a more capable floor-spacer than Smith, his inability to consistently break down set defenses in the half-court or finish at an elite rate among NBA length would relegate him to a career as a high-quality reserve—a player who can change the complexion of a quarter with his motor, but lacks the gravity or defensive versatility to sustain a starting role in the postseason.

// BADGES

// EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY

No content yet...

EBUKA_OKORIE_STAT_PROFILE
OFFENSIVE
ADJ_IMPACT
100
OFF_RAPM
85
CREATION
86
EFFICIENCY
77
BOX_CREATION
70
RIM_PRESSURE
99
RIM_ASSIST
10
REBOUNDING
52
TOV_ECONOMY
95
SPACING
67
MOREY
94
DEFENSIVE
ADJ_IMPACT
56
DEF_RAPM
61
STEALS
61
BLOCKS
64
FOUL_IQ
94
REBOUNDING
44
HEIGHT
35
WINGSPAN
69
WEIGHT
50

Percentiles are positional, measured against NBA players' last season in college.

STRENGTHS_WEAKNESSES

// OFFENSIVE_EVALUATION

No content yet...

//GAME_LOG
[2026] Stanford
DateOpponentMinUSGTS%Pts|RebAst|TovStl|BlkFG3PFTGmSc
No box score data available for this season
Source::CollegeBasketballData_API

// DEFENSIVE_EVALUATION

No content yet...

//CORE_OVERVIEW
Year
G
MPG
BPM
BPM+
PPG
RPG
APG
SPG
BPG
TOPG
TS%
rTS
2P%
3P%
FT%
'26Fr
Stanford
31
35.177
9.685
+8.599
23.296
3.642
3.639
1.665
0.359
1.972
58.9%77
+2.4%57
52.6%72
35.4%41
83.2%74
//OFFENSIVE_STATS
Year
OBPM
OBPM+
Load
USG%
TS%
rTS
2P_TS
AST%
AST/USG
AST/TO
CTOV%
FTR
3PR
Morey
UA_RIM
RIM_AST
AST'D%
'26Fr
Stanford
8.094
+8.7100
46.686
30.1%90
58.9%77
+2.4%57
62.4%81
23.9%45
0.829
1.956
6.9%95
44.9%76
0.3541
0.8394
6.499
1.910
19.0%86
//SHOOTING_STATS(per 100 poss)
Year
EFG
Rim
Rim%
Mid
Mid%
RIM/MID
3PA
3P%
FTA
FT%
'26Fr
Stanford
52.8%60
13.199
56.2%29
4.629
42.4%75
2.895
9.767
35.4%41
12.394
83.2%74
//DEFENSIVE_STATS
Year
DBPM
DBPM+
STL%
BLK%
ORB%
DRB%
FC/40
Stk/Foul
'26Fr
Stanford
1.645
-0.256
2.7%61
1.0%64
2.4%52
10.3%44
1.695
1.494
PCTL_RANK::VS_NBA_AT_POS

// PROJECTION

No content yet...

SHOT PROFILE(Per 100 Poss)
<USG%/>
30.1%90
<TS%/>
58.9%77
<MOREY/>
0.8394
<FTR/>
44.9076
RIM
56.2%29
13.1ATT99
89%UA
11%AST
MID
42.4%75
4.6ATT29
3PT
35.4%41
9.7ATT67
59%UA
41%AST
FT
83.2%74
12.3ATT94